Explain
how the political
context in which newspapers are produced, influences
their ownership and regulation. Refer to The Guardian
and The Daily Mail newspapers you have studied to support your answer. [10
marks]
The political context of both the guardian and
the daily mail have significant impacts in the ways in which they’re owned and
regulated. The newspapers political status influences its content, quality,
opinions on public issues, but perhaps only to a certain level.
The Guardian is a left wing quality newspaper
which supports the labour party. It is owned by The independent Scotts trust, a
charity which supports values such as diversity and empowerment. The ownership
of the guardian may be influenced by its political support for labour, which
also encourages such values. This is seen in almost all of the covers and news
stories of the guardian, which address issues relating to diversity or
equality. The cover featuring Meghan Markle gives the message of Britain
needing to accept ethnic diversity. The guardian also focuses on serious matters
such as Brexit, the British education system, making audiences aware of their
responsibility as citizens, mirroring the attitude of labour. The daily mail is
a popular right wing newspaper, owned by daily mail and general trust which is
under the control of Lord Rothermere, its chairman. His support for the
conservative party is seen in the content of the daily mail, which often
publishes its support for Theresa may , the royal family. Overall, the
political context of newspapers significantly impacts its ownership often
reflected through the content.
The Political context of newspapers also influences
the ways in which they’re regulated. Press Freedom is a core value in the news
industry, it gives journalists the freedom to openly support or criticize issues.
Newspapers are not owned by a government body making them free to publish without
government interference. It can be said that because of press freedom the
political context of the guardian and daily mail cannot fully dominate its
regulation. This may be why the guardian often publishes its criticism of the government
e.g. lack of support for those in poverty. The daily mail openly publishes soft
news such as celebrity gossip on its covers. However, despite the existence of
press freedom both the guardian and the daily mail are often regulated
according to their political status. The front covers of the daily mail almost
always supports members of the royal family, and create a moral panic regarding
the Muslim population.
Overall, it can be said that the political
context of the guardian and the daily mail has a significant influence on the
way their ownership and regulation. Although the political status of both
newspapers largely influences ownership, impacting its content and opinions, it
has limited control over the way both papers are regulated.
Strong understanding shown of political views of both newspapers and of the ownership models. You also understand press freedom and how this may be both positive and negative. You state "The Political context of newspapers also influences the ways in which they’re regulated." and I'm not sure you fully explain this point?? This needs further exploration. You give some examples of coverage of real news stories but this is rather vague and could be expanded. V
ReplyDelete